PAIAS logo

    Palo Alto Institute for Advanced Study

        2007-12-18

        Home Institute Profile Contact Info Feedback Search Site Map Glossary  

APPENDIX

 

Previous
Up
Next

Summary
Intro and History
Newton’s Gravity
Trojan Points and Bodies
Tadpole-Horseshoe Orbits
... Oversights
21st Century Astronomy
APPENDIX
Fig. 1 Bodies and Vectors
Fig. 2 Falling Rate Diff.
Fig. 3 Centers of Mass
Fig. 4 Lagrangian Points
Fig. 5 Tadpoles-Horseshoes
Fig. 6a Ternaries?
Fig. 6b Ternaries?
Author

Newton’s... Oversight
Einstein’s... Oversights
Entropy’s... Oversights
Comet Origins
Cosmology... Oversights
Creationism... Oversights

Newton’s Great... Oversight
Galileo’s Falling Bodies and Lagrange’s Trojan Asteroids
With Their Tadpole and Horseshoe Orbits

 

7          APPENDIX - LAGRANGIAN POINTS L1-L5,
TROJAN POINTS,
AND TADPOLE AND HORSESHOE ORBITS

 

SECTIONS

HOMOGRAPHIC SOLUTIONS

Asteroid 3753 CRUITHNE

SOHO

L3 STABILITY?!

 

 

(See Figure 4 for diagram of Langrangian/Trojan points.)

WARNING NOTE: if you have spent much time searching the Internet for info on Lagrangian points, you have probably been confused by the lack of consistency in the numbering of the points. About the only consistency that you will find there is that there is agreement that L1-L3 are the collinear points, and L4-L5 are the equilateral triangle points. Sigh... If it helps, the numbering used here is the same as that found in e.g. the Encyclopedia of the Solar System (hyperlink unfortunately no longer seems valid), pp. 815-7; Weissman, McFadden, Johnson, Eds.; Academic Press, 1999. For an example of alternate numbering (with a pedigree), see http://www.astro.queensu.ca/~wiegert/etrojans/etrojans.html (which unfortunately no longer seems valid).

 

Using his perturbation theory (a major extension of differential equations), Lagrange found 5 points — referred to collectively as “LAGRANGIAN POINTS” — where an “infinitesimal” body would theoretically maintain its position relative to the 2 non-infinitesimal bodies as they all move through space (only if completely unperturbed in the case of L1, L2, and L3; all 3 of these are considered positions of “unstable equilibrium”). These are the “homographic solutions” to the equations of motion.

HOMOGRAPHIC SOLUTIONS are (here) solutions of the equations of motion that retain the same shape — but not necessarily the same size or orientation — as the system evolves through time. I.e. the ratios of the distances between each pair of points remain the same. In particular, for the (only) solutions involving non-collinear points, the equilateral triangle formed by the 3 points remains geometrically similar to its initial configuration; i.e. it remains an equilateral triangle as it rotates, expands and contracts.

Three of these solutions, L1, L2, and L3 are collinear — i.e. all 3 bodies lie on a straight line as they move through space, revolving around their common center of gravity. The other two, L4 and L5, are the TROJAN POINTS at the equilateral triangle positions (which we have just found — incompletely — by questioning Galileo’s hypothesis that lighter and heavier bodies fall at the same rate). Asteroids that orbit these points are known as “TROJAN ASTEROIDS”. Jupiter’s Trojan asteroids can take hundreds of years to complete such an orbit. (They are mostly in “tadpole” orbits, but probably at least some in “horseshoe” orbits. See below.)

Although L1-L3 are theoretically stable if “unperturbed” (this is the meaning of the homographic solution result), they are known to be unstable in fact (or thought to be; see below). Infinitesimal bodies placed there will eventually “wander away” under the influence of “perturbations” induced by e.g. the gravitational influence of other planets.

The points L4 and L5 are considered stable, i.e. if the perturbations are small enough, infinitesimal bodies placed there will stay near the Trojan points in relatively stable “TADPOLE ORBITS” (see Figure 5), elongated, non-elliptical, asymmetrically curved orbits. If the perturbations on Trojan bodies are large enough and concerted enough, their tadpole orbits might even “grow” in such a way that (mixing metaphors) the L4 and L5 tadpoles meet and form still stable “HORSESHOE ORBITS” (as seen in the reference frame of e.g. the Earth). (See Figure 5.) The more energy the 3rd body has, the larger the tadpole or horseshoe orbit (and the easier it might be to perturb it sufficiently for it to escape). Figure 5 shows these “concentric” tadpole and horseshoe orbits.

 

 

SECTIONS

HOMOGRAPHIC SOLUTIONS

Asteroid 3753 CRUITHNE

SOHO

L3 STABILITY?!

 

Asteroid 3753 CRUITHNE is an example of an “Earth companion”, a body in a very peculiar horseshoe orbit relative to Earth. As of this writing, two of the web sites that give interesting info about Cruithne are:

http://aries.phys.yorku.ca/~wiegert/3753.html (which unfortunately no longer seems valid) and

http://focus.aps.org/v4/st16.html

 SOHO — L1 has become famous because that is where SOHO, the Solar and Heliospheric Observatory, is stationed. Due primarily to the Earth-Sun mass ratio, L1 is about 1% closer to the Sun than the Earth, so about 930,000 miles sunward from Earth. (L2 is about 1% further away from the Sun.) The lack of stability means that it must use fuel to keep itself sufficiently near L1. Actually it orbits L1 in what is called a “Halo Orbit”. (NASA has web pages that give interesting details.) This special orbit actually keeps it somewhat away from L1, which is in direct line of sight with the Sun, i.e. enough away from solar interference to send data back. Roughly every 27 days SOHO must readjust its orbit.

L3 is almost precisely the same distance away from the Sun as Earth (approximately millionths of a percent difference), and on the opposite side. This is because the gravitational effect of Earth is very small at twice its distance to the Sun. L3 is the place where science fiction has placed some of its alternate Earths, but scientists are sure that this is not feasible because, as with SOHO in L1, its instability means that a body (at least an “infinitesimal” body) would drift away from L3 if energy were not expended to keep it there. But let us remind ourselves: scientists are sure about this in the same way they have been sure for almost 400 years that lighter and heavier bodies fall at precisely the same rate!

 

 

SECTIONS

HOMOGRAPHIC SOLUTIONS

Asteroid 3753 CRUITHNE

SOHO

L3 STABILITY?!

 

 L3 STABILITY?!: By the way, you may have noted that the L3 point is in the “band” of the “concentric” horseshoe orbits, and that this might technically make it a point of “stable” equilibrium since the tadpole orbits are considered part of the stability of L4 and L5, and they expand and merge into the horseshoe orbits. Good for you! Science — and mathematics — need to have their inconsistencies pointed out. (Now, what about L1 and L2?!...)

 

 

Previous Next

 


 
                                        

 

Send mail to webmaster(at)paias(dot)org with questions or comments about this web site.
All contents subject to change without notice.
Copyright © 1994-2003, Palo Alto Institute for Advanced Study. All rights reserved under International and Pan-American Copyright Conventions.
Last modified: 12/18/07